A total of 79 local Governments responded to the survey, providing insights into how they manage Permissive Tax Exemptions (PTE) and Grants in Aid (GIA) programs. Theresponses reveal significant civersity in approaches,though several clear trends emerge.
BUDGETING AND CAPS
For PTE, the dominant pattern is the absence of formal caps: over 60% of respondents reported “no cap”. A smaller group uses percentage-based limits tied to property tax revenue (commonly between 0.6% and 5%), while others apply fixed dollar caps or council discretion. In contrast, GIA programs are more likely to have defined caps, with about 38% specifying a dollar limit (ranging from $5,000 to $750,000), and another 27% using discretionary or policy-based approaches. Only a minority link GIA budgets to property tax percentages.
INTAKE AND DECISION MODELS
The most common intake model is a single unified annual intake, adopted by nearly half of respondents. This approach provides predictability and aligns with annual budget cycles. About 22% use rolling or continuous intake, offering flexibility for emerging needs, while 19% run multiple program intakes throughout the year. A few municipalities employ hybrid or ad hoc models, often tied to council discretion or special funding streams.
TRANSPARENCY AND REPORTING
Transparency practices are generally strong: 65% of respondents make processes public, either through council agendas, published lists, or annual reports. However, reporting and proportionality remain limited, with 81% indicating no formal reporting requirements for recipients. Only a small fraction (16%) require structured accountability measures, such as financial statements or proportionality checks.
OBSERVATIONS AND TRENDS
- Permissive Tax Exemptions are largely uncapped, reflecting their role as a policy tool rather than a strictly budgeted program.
- Grants-in-Aid show greater fiscal control, often through dollar caps or council-set limits.
- Annual intakes dominate, but continuous models are common in smaller communities or where flexibility is prioritized.
- Transparency is widely practiced, yet formal reporting lags, suggesting an opportunity for improved accountability.
Overall, the data suggests a strong commitmentto supporting community organizations, but with considerable variation in structure and oversight. While permissive tax exemptions remain broadly accessible and policy-driven, grants-in-aid tend to be more regulated and budget-conscious. Opportunities exist to enhance consistency in reporting and explore best practices for balancing flexibility with accountability.
The Next Quarterly Question Will be on | Strengths, Challenges, and Real-World Issues: Capital Plans & Budgets
Please use this link to be a contributor. This short survey should only take 3-5 minutes to complete. If you would like to contribute topics for upcoming questions, please contact office@gfoabc.ca or call (250) 382-6871.
Visit past survey results.